343.47+31.0% · 1 yearclose of Oct 16, 2026
Closes from Twelve Data, one per session
Latest fact on the record (EDGAR): □ Oct 13, 2026 · Insider sell · 1 sell worth $827.7K
Its context: 723 in Information Technology, US548 on NASDAQ
Open the page →7,242 companies
Stock research · US and Europe · in plain language
No company
makes sense alone.
Every morning we read its market across seven layers, look for comparable moments in history and show you what changed since you started following it.
62.70+10.4% · 1 yearclose of Oct 16, 2026
Closes from Twelve Data, one per session
Does not file with the SEC: no EDGAR facts over its price.
Its context: 286 in Consumer Discretionary, Europe20 on BME (Madrid)
Open the page →1,658.08+58.4% · 1 yearclose of Oct 16, 2026
Closes from Twelve Data, one per session
Latest fact on the record (EDGAR): ● Feb 25, 2026 · Annual report filed · 20-F · disclosed on Feb 25, 2026
Its context: 297 in Information Technology, Europe10 on Euronext Amsterdam
Open the page →445.61-37.5% · 1 yearclose of Oct 16, 2026
Closes from Twelve Data, one per session
Does not file with the SEC: no EDGAR facts over its price.
Its context: 286 in Consumer Discretionary, Europe104 on Euronext Paris
Open the page →Every dot is a real company we cover: 7,242 after our filters, across 11 exchanges in the US and Europe. Lit up: 200 of the 212 with insider purchases or sales reported from Oct 12, 2026 to Oct 19, 2026, the ones with the most trades.Each oval is an exchange, sized by its companies: 7,242 after our filters, across 11 exchanges in the US and Europe.
Apple, in its context: 723 Information Technology companies in the US. Where each dot sits only says its exchange and sector, in alphabetical order; it is not a score.
An analysis, step by step
Four steps to read a company with its context.
Choose one of the two companies and follow the journey. The context and precedents are a real reading from one specific day, frozen to show it; inside the product they refresh every morning.
What's on the table
AAPLApple Inc.343.47+31.0% · 1 year
Apple Inc. is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Cupertino, California, in Silicon Valley, and known for consumer electronics, software and online services.
with an account○dividends▲splits◌next earnings
See the 10 days with insider sales between Aug 18, 2026 and Oct 13, 2026 one by one
- Aug 18, 20261 sell worth $442.5K · pre-arranged planDocument on EDGAR
- Aug 25, 20261 sell worth $447.5K · pre-arranged planDocument on EDGAR
- Sep 1, 20261 sell worth $456.2K · pre-arranged planDocument on EDGAR
- Sep 8, 20261 sell worth $456.2K · pre-arranged planDocument on EDGAR
- Sep 15, 20261 sell worth $474.8K · pre-arranged planDocument on EDGAR
- Sep 22, 20261 sell worth $815.8K · pre-arranged planDocument on EDGAR
- Sep 29, 20261 sell worth $806.5K · pre-arranged planDocument on EDGAR
- Oct 2, 202610 sells worth $87.8M · pre-arranged planDocument on EDGAR
- Oct 6, 20261 sell worth $796.5K · pre-arranged planDocument on EDGAR
- Oct 13, 20261 sell worth $827.7K · pre-arranged planDocument on EDGAR
Closing price and, on top of it, the facts from the public record: filed results, declared insider trades, material events filed. It's the starting point, not a conclusion.
The question this step leaves you with
What's happening around this company as its price does this?
The limit. A price move alongside a fact doesn't prove the fact caused it.
Its sector and its market, the same day
Information Technology · United States
lagging
42
Sector landscape of United States
risk
All the sectors of the region —how many lead, repair, tire or sit at risk— measured against their own history. It is not Apple's sector: that is the card next to it.
The market, in six more layers
Each layer, except the regime, is measured against its own history and expressed as a percentile. It is not a grade or a probability: the ends of the gauge say which way each one points. The regime is a state, with no scale.
Regime
bear
Market breadth
narrow
Rates curve
restrictive
Market stress
elevated
Credit stress
normal
Liquidity flow
expanding (flow direction only, not a level)
The closest moment
Between Nov 7, 2025 and Nov 14, 2025, the region had a medium similarity reading: stress, credit, and regime and breadth matched. 62 comparable periods through Sep 15, 2026. Different: rates and sector cycles.
What this reading shows
With the market now bearish, credit calm and volatility low for its history — although drawdowns from highs keep stress in the elevated band — what stands out in Apple's reading is its sector: Information Technology has just turned lagging. The index alone doesn't tell you what's happening in its sector.
The question this step leaves you with
Is the strength, or the weakness, Apple's own, or does it share it with Information Technology and with its market?
The limit. Company and sector moving together doesn't explain why the company moves: it raises the question, it doesn't answer it.
What happened the other times the market looked like this
We search in the history of Apple the moments when its region looked like the reading from the previous step: 62 comparable periods (0 high similarity, 2 medium, 60 partial); the latest one starts on Apr 20, 2026. And we watch what the stock did next.
One month later
+5.2 %
The middle half between -1.2 % and +9.3 %
Three months later
+6.9 %
The middle half between +1.9 % and +17.2 %
Six months later
+15.6 %
The middle half between +1.6 % and +27.1 %
The question this step leaves you with
Does my reading hold up if I look at how comparable situations ended?
The limit. It's not a prediction: it's the distribution of what happened in overlapping windows, and it only exists for companies still trading today (survivorship bias).
What we check for you once you follow it
If you had added it to your watchlist on Jun 16, 2026, today (Sep 15, 2026) you'd see which layers have changed state and which haven't.
| Layer | Then | Now |
|---|---|---|
| Regime | sideways | bear |
| Market breadth | mixed | narrow |
| Rates curve | mixed | restrictive |
| Market stress | calm | elevated |
| Credit stress | normal | normal |
| Sector cycles | risk | risk |
| Liquidity flow | — | — |
The question this step leaves you with
Does what I thought still hold, or did the ground shift under the company?
The limit. A layer changing state doesn't tell you what to do: it tells you to read again.
What's on the table
ASMLASML Holding N.V.1,658.08+58.4% · 1 year
ASML Holding N.V. is a Dutch multinational corporation that develops and manufactures photolithography machines, which are used to produce integrated circuits.
with an account○dividends▲splits◌next earnings
Closing price and, on top of it, the facts from the public record: filed results, declared insider trades, material events filed. It's the starting point, not a conclusion.
The question this step leaves you with
What's happening around this company as its price does this?
The limit. A price move alongside a fact doesn't prove the fact caused it.
Its sector and its market, the same day
Information Technology · Europe
deteriorating
51
Sector landscape of Europe
risk
All the sectors of the region —how many lead, repair, tire or sit at risk— measured against their own history. It is not ASML's sector: that is the card next to it.
The market, in six more layers
Each layer, except the regime, is measured against its own history and expressed as a percentile. It is not a grade or a probability: the ends of the gauge say which way each one points. The regime is a state, with no scale.
Regime
bear
Market breadth
narrow
Rates curve
insufficient read at this date · percentile available; state not classified
Market stress
elevated
Credit stress
normal
Liquidity flow
insufficient read at this date · percentile available; state not classified
The closest moment
Between Oct 24, 2007 and Nov 9, 2007, the region had a medium similarity reading: stress and credit matched. 66 comparable periods through Sep 15, 2026. Different: rates and sector cycles.
What this reading shows
In Europe the market has also turned bearish, and ASML's sector has just entered a deteriorating phase. If the weakness comes from the sector rather than the market, the question is whether ASML shares it.
The question this step leaves you with
Is the strength, or the weakness, ASML's own, or does it share it with Information Technology and with its market?
The limit. Company and sector moving together doesn't explain why the company moves: it raises the question, it doesn't answer it.
What happened the other times the market looked like this
We search in the history of ASML the moments when its region looked like the reading from the previous step: 66 comparable periods (0 high similarity, 7 medium, 59 partial); the latest one starts on May 6, 2026. And we watch what the stock did next.
One month later
+2.8 %
The middle half between -3.5 % and +7.0 %
Three months later
+8.6 %
The middle half between -1.4 % and +14.6 %
Six months later
+10.1 %
The middle half between -1.8 % and +21.9 %
The question this step leaves you with
Does my reading hold up if I look at how comparable situations ended?
The limit. It's not a prediction: it's the distribution of what happened in overlapping windows, and it only exists for companies still trading today (survivorship bias).
What we check for you once you follow it
If you had added it to your watchlist on Jun 16, 2026, today (Sep 15, 2026) you'd see which layers have changed state and which haven't.
| Layer | Then | Now |
|---|---|---|
| Regime | sideways | bear |
| Market breadth | mixed | narrow |
| Rates curve | — | — |
| Market stress | calm | elevated |
| Credit stress | normal | normal |
| Sector cycles | risk | risk |
| Liquidity flow | — | — |
The question this step leaves you with
Does what I thought still hold, or did the ground shift under the company?
The limit. A layer changing state doesn't tell you what to do: it tells you to read again.
Questions, not tabs
What you want to know, in the order you ask it.
Which companies deserve a closer look?
The Radar scores our universe of eligible companies every morning and leaves you a short list with the why behind each name.
See the Radar →
What supports what I see in this company?
The company page brings together price, facts from the public record and the context of its sector and its market, with dates and coverage in sight.
Look up a company →
Does my idea hold up if conditions change?
The Research Lab tests a hypothesis by region, sector, horizon and regime: it compares it with the market and its sector, checks whether it holds across eras and shows the companies and dates that meet it.
See the Lab →
What changed since I started following it?
Your watchlist keeps the read from the day you add a company and shows you, layer by layer, what changed state.
See your watchlist →
Public record · this week
Purchases and sales reported by insiders.
We read the Form 4 filings the SEC publishes every day and separate purchases and sales from the rest: share awards, tax withholding and other transactions. A purchase is not the same as shares received as compensation.
840
declared purchases and sales
1,211
grants, withholdings and other movements, set apart
328
notices of sale (Form 144)
45
13D filings this month
A notice is not a sale. A purchase is not a signal. Open the company and check its original documents on EDGAR.
See the full records →Public profile · no account
Closing price, what the company does, its SEC record in plain language and its executives' transactions. Free, for the 7,242 companies in the universe; what each profile shows depends on its coverage.
Numbers we don't dress up
A real, filtered, auditable universe.
7,242
operating companies
11
US and European exchanges
40
years of credit history
2005
daily prices since
Left out on purpose: funds, ETFs, duplicates and contaminated series. And when a figure is missing, we say so.
How to get in
Company profiles and examples are open. The tools are invite-only during the beta.
Browse all 7,242 company pages without an account. If you want the Radar, the context, the Lab and your watchlist, request access and we'll let you know.
Research, not advice
HornScout is a research and analytics product. It does not provide personalized advice or trade signals. Patterns and historical context inform decisions; they do not replace your own judgment.