Stock research · US and Europe · in plain language
Every morning we read its market across seven layers, look for comparable moments in history and show you what changed since you started following it.
Every dot is a real company we cover: 7,283 after our filters, across 11 exchanges in the US and Europe.
This is how the Radar works every morning: from all of them to a short list, with the why behind each name. A schematic of the process; the real list is inside.
An analysis, step by step
Choose one of the two companies and follow the journey. The context and precedents are a real reading from one specific day, frozen to show it; inside the product they refresh every morning.
Apple Inc. is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Cupertino, California, in Silicon Valley, and known for consumer electronics, software and online services.
Closing price and, on top of it, the facts from the public record: filed results, declared insider trades, material events filed. It's the starting point, not a conclusion.
The question this step leaves you with
What's happening around this company as its price does this?
The limit. A price move alongside a fact doesn't prove the fact caused it.
Information Technology · United States
lagging
Sector landscape of United States
risk
All the sectors of the region —how many lead, repair, tire or sit at risk— measured against their own history. It is not Apple's sector: that is the card next to it.
Each layer, except the regime, is measured against its own history and expressed as a percentile. It is not a grade or a probability: the ends of the gauge say which way each one points. The regime is a state, with no scale.
Regime
bear
Market breadth
narrow
Rates curve
restrictive
Market stress
elevated
Credit stress
normal
Liquidity flow
expanding (flow direction only, not a level)
The closest moment
Between Nov 7, 2025 and Nov 14, 2025, the region had a medium similarity reading: stress, credit, and regime and breadth matched. 62 comparable periods through Sep 15, 2026. Different: rates and sector cycles.
What this reading shows
With the market now bearish, credit calm and volatility low for its history — although drawdowns from highs keep stress in the elevated band — what stands out in Apple's reading is its sector: Information Technology has just turned lagging. The index alone doesn't tell you what's happening in its sector.
The question this step leaves you with
Is the strength, or the weakness, Apple's own, or does it share it with Information Technology and with its market?
The limit. Company and sector moving together doesn't explain why the company moves: it raises the question, it doesn't answer it.
We search in the history of Apple the moments when its region looked like the reading from the previous step: 62 comparable periods (0 high similarity, 2 medium, 60 partial); the latest one starts on Apr 20, 2026. And we watch what the stock did next.
+5.2 %
The middle half between -1.2 % and +9.3 %
+6.9 %
The middle half between +1.9 % and +17.2 %
+15.6 %
The middle half between +1.6 % and +27.1 %
The question this step leaves you with
Does my reading hold up if I look at how comparable situations ended?
The limit. It's not a prediction: it's the distribution of what happened in overlapping windows, and the oldest history has survivorship bias.
If you had added it to your watchlist on Jun 16, 2026, today (Sep 15, 2026) you'd see which layers have changed state and which haven't.
| Layer | Then | Now |
|---|---|---|
| Regime | sideways | bear |
| Market breadth | mixed | narrow |
| Rates curve | mixed | restrictive |
| Market stress | calm | elevated |
| Credit stress | normal | normal |
| Sector cycles | risk | risk |
| Liquidity flow | — | — |
The question this step leaves you with
Does what I thought still hold, or did the ground shift under the company?
The limit. A layer changing state doesn't tell you what to do: it tells you to read again.
ASML Holding N.V. is a Dutch multinational corporation that develops and manufactures photolithography machines, which are used to produce integrated circuits.
Closing price and, on top of it, the facts from the public record: filed results, declared insider trades, material events filed. It's the starting point, not a conclusion.
The question this step leaves you with
What's happening around this company as its price does this?
The limit. A price move alongside a fact doesn't prove the fact caused it.
Information Technology · Europe
deteriorating
Sector landscape of Europe
risk
All the sectors of the region —how many lead, repair, tire or sit at risk— measured against their own history. It is not ASML's sector: that is the card next to it.
Each layer, except the regime, is measured against its own history and expressed as a percentile. It is not a grade or a probability: the ends of the gauge say which way each one points. The regime is a state, with no scale.
Regime
bear
Market breadth
narrow
Rates curve
insufficient read at this date · percentile available; state not classified
Market stress
elevated
Credit stress
normal
Liquidity flow
insufficient read at this date · percentile available; state not classified
The closest moment
Between Oct 24, 2007 and Nov 9, 2007, the region had a medium similarity reading: stress and credit matched. 66 comparable periods through Sep 15, 2026. Different: rates and sector cycles.
What this reading shows
In Europe the market has also turned bearish, and ASML's sector has just entered a deteriorating phase. If the weakness comes from the sector rather than the market, the question is whether ASML shares it.
The question this step leaves you with
Is the strength, or the weakness, ASML's own, or does it share it with Information Technology and with its market?
The limit. Company and sector moving together doesn't explain why the company moves: it raises the question, it doesn't answer it.
We search in the history of ASML the moments when its region looked like the reading from the previous step: 66 comparable periods (0 high similarity, 7 medium, 59 partial); the latest one starts on May 6, 2026. And we watch what the stock did next.
+2.8 %
The middle half between -3.5 % and +7.0 %
+8.6 %
The middle half between -1.4 % and +14.6 %
+10.1 %
The middle half between -1.8 % and +21.9 %
The question this step leaves you with
Does my reading hold up if I look at how comparable situations ended?
The limit. It's not a prediction: it's the distribution of what happened in overlapping windows, and the oldest history has survivorship bias.
If you had added it to your watchlist on Jun 16, 2026, today (Sep 15, 2026) you'd see which layers have changed state and which haven't.
| Layer | Then | Now |
|---|---|---|
| Regime | sideways | bear |
| Market breadth | mixed | narrow |
| Rates curve | — | — |
| Market stress | calm | elevated |
| Credit stress | normal | normal |
| Sector cycles | risk | risk |
| Liquidity flow | — | — |
The question this step leaves you with
Does what I thought still hold, or did the ground shift under the company?
The limit. A layer changing state doesn't tell you what to do: it tells you to read again.
Questions, not tabs
The Radar scores our universe of eligible companies every morning and leaves you a short list with the why behind each name.
See the Radar →
The company page brings together price, facts from the public record and the context of its sector and its market, with dates and coverage in sight.
Look up a company →
The Research Lab tests a hypothesis by region, sector, horizon and regime: it compares it with the market and its sector, checks whether it holds across eras and shows the companies and dates that meet it.
See the Lab →
Your watchlist keeps the read from the day you add a company and shows you, layer by layer, what changed state.
See your watchlist →
Public record · this week
We read the Form 4 filings the SEC publishes every day and separate purchases and sales from the rest: share awards, tax withholding and other transactions. A purchase is not the same as shares received as compensation.
1,895
declared purchases and sales
2,765
grants, withholdings and other movements, set apart
741
notices of sale (Form 144)
31
13D filings this month
A notice is not a sale. A purchase is not a signal. Open the company and check its original documents on EDGAR.
See the full records →Public profile · no account
Closing price, what the company does, its SEC record in plain language and its executives' transactions. Free, for the 7,283 companies in the universe; what each profile shows depends on its coverage.
Numbers we don't dress up
7,283
operating companies
11
US and European exchanges
40
years of credit history
2005
daily prices since
Left out on purpose: funds, ETFs, duplicates and contaminated series. And when a figure is missing, we say so.
How to get in
Browse all 7,283 company pages without an account. If you want the Radar, the context, the Lab and your watchlist, request access and we'll let you know.
Research, not advice
HornScout is a research and analytics product. It does not provide personalized advice or trade signals. Patterns and historical context inform decisions; they do not replace your own judgment.
