Find what deserves
a closer look.

Four ways to start

The same day. Four questions.

Beyond the Core lens list, Radar highlights four candidates by role, each with its rule in plain sight. When none qualifies, the gap is stated, not filled.

1. 01Review first

   The candidate with the highest priority in the lens. It is the first reading, not the best company: open its drivers and check what could change the diagnosis.

   The highest priority in the list.

   In the list of Aug 11, 2026: Globus Medical Inc. (GMED). Highest priority in the list.

2. 02Best fundamentals

   An entry centred on the strength of the business, with the five pillars in front of you. It helps separate a solid fundamental reading from the appeal of the chart.

   Fundamentals of 58 out of 100 or more; among those, the highest.

   In the list of Aug 11, 2026: Newmont Corporation (NEM). Here for its fundamentals: 77/100.

3. 03Already moving

   It looks for enough participation for the move to deserve attention now. When no candidate qualifies, the absence is stated together with the maximum that did occur.

   Volume of 1.5× its sixty-session average or more; among those, the largest.

   In the list of Aug 11, 2026: Cronos Group Inc. (CRON). Volume 2.23× its 60-day average.

4. 04Steadiest price

   Another way into the day: the candidate with the steadiest evolution profile in the list, with its notices just as visible.

   Compounder risk profile; among those, the highest priority.

   In the list of Aug 11, 2026: STERIS plc (STE). Steady ride (compounder), priority 71.6.

How a lens is thought out

Filter before you rank. Say how old each figure is.

What Radar does before showing you anything, and what it cannot say.

The families

The recent rise, pullback, repricing, repair and confirmation lenses look for a price state, without saying which way it goes. Core is the house blend: with quotas, it brings together quality pullback, confirmation and names that have moved between −8% and +15% over three months, with no volume spike and close to their 200-session average, sorted by priority. A lens does not predict; it narrows where to look.

Your own lenses

With Pro+ you define your conditions in the Research Lab, check them against US or European history since 2005 and save them as a Radar lens, recomputed every morning alongside the built-in lenses.

Liquidity by default

The liquidity filter starts on: it prioritizes companies that pass it; you can widen the search from there. It can be switched off, and then what appears says so.

What is ruled out first

What has already risen too far in 60 sessions, what trades at its yearly high, what comes from a very steep fall and what reports earnings within days, according to each lens's rules: with earnings imminent, the price may move on the numbers rather than on what the lens looks for.

Drivers and brakes

Each candidate carries one or two drivers (the state of its price and, where present, a second item: relative strength against its sector, growth support, pullback quality or an event with a recorded date) and, where present, a technical brake. They are labels with thresholds, not opinions.

Notices, by family

Record notices come from public filings and are grouped into families (financial, liquidity, events, structure, sector, data) with their severity. The headline one is the most serious of the day; the rest is in the profile.

Coverage and bias

Operating companies in the United States and Europe. This sample is from the United States; Europe is served with the same lenses. The history used to test the lenses only includes companies still trading today: those that stopped trading are missing, in every year and not only before 2016. Data and document coverage depends on each issuer and is stated in its profile.

Honest freshness

Each list carries the date it was computed and each notice the date of its source. Old data looks old; missing data says so. We don't fill gaps.